top of page

Freaky Friday Files: The Lake Bodom Murders

  • Writer: Ash
    Ash
  • 4 days ago
  • 4 min read

Disclaimer: This blog post discusses sensitive topics such as true crime and unsolved murder. Reader discretion advised.


Hi friends. For this week's edition of Freaky Friday Files, I thought we could take a look at the unsolved mystery of the Lake Bodom Murders. Hope you enjoy another true crime post from me!!


It's a pretty strange one.


PIN IT

Poster reading Freaky Friday Files: The Lake Bodom Murders with a bloody cleaver icon and asheycakes.com on white background
PIN IT

The Lake Bodom Murders


Let's set the scene. Four teenagers (Maila Irmeli Björklund, Anja Tuulikki Mäki, Seppo Boisman, and Nils Gustafsson) embark on an overnight camping trip at Lake Bodom, Espoo, Finland. It's the 1960s, so the vibes are very chill, and they plan on having a great night. However, between 4 AM and 6 AM on the 5th of June, 1960, events end up taking a dark, notorious turn for the worse.


Three of the teenagers end up brutally murdered, with one sole survivor (Nils Gustafsson). Maila, Anja, and Seppo were k*lled by st*bbing and blunt-force trauma to their heads inside their tent, and Nils was found outside (still alive) with broken facial bones and stab wounds. I believe that the teenagers were couples (the men were 18 and the girls were 15 at the time). I don't know how common it was for 15-year-old girls to date 18-year-old men at the time (or how common it is in Finland, but it's not that common here).


The murders remain unsolved to this day.


If you are like me and like to think about Occam's Razor, then your first thought is probably, "Oh, did Nils do it?" However, there wasn't a trial UNTIL 44 years later - in 2005. In 2004, Nils was found guilty and arrested. It was argued that "[Nils] Gustafsson had been drunk and excluded from the tent when he attacked the other boy, getting his jaw broken in a fight which escalated into him committing three murders." I believe the bureau really thought there was enough forensic evidence to convict Nils. In 2005, it was argued by Nil's defence that Nil would have been incapable of m*rdering three other people due to the extent of his injuries. It's kinda like someone had set Nils up to take the fall, as someone had moved and used his shoes, and they had blood on them, and I think used them during the m*rders. Anyway, Nils was acquitted in 2005.


So what happened after the murders?


Following the attack, Nils claimed that he saw an "unknown assailant" who was wearing black and had "bright red eyes" coming at the victims. Then, around 6 AM that morning, a group of bird watchers noticed the tent collapse and saw a blonde man walk away. The bodies were found around 11 AM by a carpenter, Esko Oiva Johansson, who alerted authorities, and police showed up around 12 PM that day.


No one has ever found the m*rder w*apons. And according to Wikipedia, "The killer had taken several items which detectives found puzzling, including the keys to the victims' motorcycles, which themselves had been left behind. Some of the missing clothing items, including Gustafsson's shoes, were found partially hidden approximately 500 metres from the murder site. The police did not cordon off the site nor record the details of the scene (later seen as a major error) and almost immediately allowed a crowd of police officers and other people to trample around and disturb the evidence. The mistake was further exacerbated by calling in soldiers to assist with the search around the lake for the missing items, several of which were never found."


I'm glad police work has come a long way since the 1960s. It's pretty f*cked (IMO) that they didn't do a good job at keeping the crime scene intact - that may have helped them immensely.


So other than Nil's, who were the suspects??


  • Valdemar Gyllström: A campsite kiosk keeper who was known for being violent towards campers and often threw rocks at people and would cut down tents. He did confess to the m*rders, but authorities didn't believe it was him due to his disturbed nature. He ended his life in 1969 by drowning in the lake.

  • Hans Assmann: I think this guy was only suspected, as some books were written about him being the perpetrator. On the morning of the 6th of June, 1960, Assmann turned up in Helsinki in bloody clothes. I think he had an alibi for these m*rders, but later on in life he confessed to other crimes - like way later, literally on his d*athbed.

  • Pentti Soininen: A person known for having violent tendencies was suspected because he claimed to have confessed to doing these m*rders to a cellmate in prison. However, Pentti would have only been 14 years old at the time, so it's not clear whether he would have single-handedly been able to overpower 4 other, bigger teenagers.


The Finnish death metal band, Children of Bodom, was named after these infamous m*rders.


I still am confused about Nils. I don't know him personally and feel like considering the injuries he sustained, it probably wasn't him. I can't imagine the psychological torture that he went through because, like if I put myself in his shoes, I'd probably start questioning reality and think "was I the one who did it?" even if I knew I hadn't. Or, maybe he's told the lie so well that he even believes it himself - I hope that isn't the case, just things I have thought about in researching this case. I also wanna know who the blonde guy was because if it was a random blonde guy, he really committed the perfect crime (ugh). May the three vicitims rest in peace.


So, who do you think did it?

Stay safe,

Ash x




References:





SAVE TO PINTEREST

Black poster with a white handprint and text: Freaky Friday Files, The Lake Bodom Murders, and www.asheycakes.com.
SAVE TO PINTEREST

2 Comments

Rated 0 out of 5 stars.
No ratings yet

Add a rating
lisalisa
a day ago
Rated 5 out of 5 stars.

This was such an interesting read! I've always been fascinated by unsolved mysteries, and the Lake Bodom case is definitely one that leaves more questions than answers. It's hard not to wonder whether crucial evidence was lost because the crime scene wasn't properly secured.

Like
Ash
Ash
15 hours ago
Replying to

Thank you so much. I agree, I think there may have been more evidence if they had secured the scene in time!!

Like
My logo
bottom of page